#2 2009-03-07 14:25:42
So... did you boff his Mum, Lad?
Offline
#3 2009-03-07 14:38:43
That kid is just begging for the Mother of All Wedgies. I mean, a sweater vest over a pink shirt?
People like that are why God invented the tranquilizer gun and LSD.
Offline
#4 2009-03-07 14:41:57
Dude, you got some?
Offline
#5 2009-03-07 14:49:52
I would've added, "...and take his lunch money, too.", but he's (all together now) home-schooled...
Offline
#6 2009-03-07 14:53:58
When that kid hits his rebel-against-everything phase it will be a thing to behold.
(Kids still have those, right?)
Offline
#7 2009-03-07 14:58:31
Ah, just wait until this boy's perversions come to light. I'm sure we will be all shocked - SHOCKED I say, that he likes little boys (in sweater-vests).
Offline
#8 2009-03-07 15:27:58
AladdinSane wrote:
I would've added, "...and take his lunch money, too.", but he's (all together now) home-schooled...
When the homeschooled finally find themselves out in the world--free for the first time in their lives--it is nearly always spectacular. Especially the ones who aren't socialized.
Offline
#9 2009-03-07 15:30:15
And another thing: Why isn't the conservative movement in this country trying to get itself together and get its credibility back, instead of turning itself into a circus, complete with freaks like this child?
Offline
#10 2009-03-07 17:00:36
I see he’s already beginning to suck the rancid poontang of the Israel lobby. Too bad Jews don’t relate very well to people who try to be Jewish and Christian at the same time.
Offline
#11 2009-03-07 17:02:17
George Orr wrote:
And another thing: Why isn't the conservative movement in this country trying to get itself together and get its credibility back, instead of turning itself into a circus, complete with freaks like this child?
They're under the misconception that they lost the election because they weren't "conservative" enough, so they've had no choice but to go as far off into Nutsville as they can to find their champions.
Offline
#12 2009-03-08 21:13:09
We send this guy:
to beat up this guy:
Last edited by GooberMcNutly (2009-03-08 21:14:15)
Offline
#13 2009-03-09 13:29:29
Arrogance at such an early age is disturbing. Perhaps beating him up is insufficient.
Offline
#14 2009-03-10 09:20:23
You are right. Someone needs to humiliate him. As a religious conservative pundit, will it be drugs or hookers? Only time will tell.
Offline
#15 2009-03-11 19:53:03
GooberMcNutly wrote:
You are right. Someone needs to humiliate him. As a religious conservative pundit, will it be drugs or hookers? Only time will tell.
I'm guessing he sleeps with his mama every night.
Offline
#16 2009-03-11 20:43:17
We shouldn't be so hard on this kid just because he's a total loser whose mom still dresses him.
Offline
#17 2009-03-11 21:38:10
GooberMcNutly wrote:
You are right. Someone needs to humiliate him. As a religious conservative pundit, will it be drugs or hookers? Only time will tell.
Who knows? Perhaps he has a "wide stance."
Offline
#18 2009-03-11 21:39:54
AladdinSane wrote:
He has the Al Franken type of annoyance level judging by his appearance.
Offline
#19 2009-03-12 00:21:49
OK, who's ready for "Someone please beat this kid up: Round 2"?
Apparently children who act like experts is a new "thing." I've heard of a just-pubescent restaurant reviewer, now GQ brings us The Littlest Fashion Fag!
This is my favorite outfit. The tie is a regular tie, but I tied it like that because I’ve seen it done that way in old English movies. Even though the tie and the jacket are different colors, they’re both striped, so I thought they looked right together. And I wore the vest and pants together because they’re both shades of red.
Why are these kids being listened to by anyone? I thought it was common knowledge that kids this age don't know shit about shit?
Offline
#20 2009-03-12 00:56:52
Whatever happened to "children should be seen and not heard"?
I have a friend who has an adorable 5-y-o that talks constantly. My friend and his wife expect everyone around to stop everything while the boy talks, which he does non-stop. He can be in another room talking up some other adults and you and someone are having a conversation and are in mid-sentence and the boy comes in to tell you about his favorite thing of the day, and my friend or his wife will get PISSED at you if you don't stop what you are saying and allow the boy to manipulate all conversation from that point forward.
Needless to say, my friend and his wife (and their now 2 children) spend most of their time together, as a family, and company doesn't come round anymore....
The sad thing is, I've seen this sort of thing in several "only child" families going back to the 90's.
Back in my grandmothers day, all the kids quit talking the moment their dad walked through the door and didn't say another word until he left for work the next morning. Funny thing is, they all turned out great, had great families and seemed happy as hell, even though if they stepped out of line, when they were kids, they had to go cut their own switch.....
Oh yeah, I forgot, kids and teens are so much more well behaved and well mannered now than they were before Dr Phil and Oprah....
Jr Republican and Jr Fashionista are simply products of the "It Takes a Village" age.
Offline
#21 2009-03-12 01:17:08
As an only child, albeit the only child of a Southerner and a non-Southerner who liked Southern manners, I was encouraged to speak my mind but there was a limit to everything. I didn't talk back to adults, I didn't question what adults said in front of others, and I certainly never corrected an adult in front of others. The times I did I was told in no uncertain terms that I was out of line. Oh, and - of course - I "ma'amed" and "sirred" everyone who was an adult.
Oddly, I still expect that from kids but I'm usually disappointed.
Offline
#22 2009-03-12 01:35:21
Here's a piece about the whole child-foodie thing.
If all this kinder-worship was intended to get children more interested in restaurants and cooking, it would have McDonald's CEO quaking. But it appears these features are meant to appeal to adults, since not many little kids peruse the Sunday magazine for recipes or control the remote. And that is absurd: Children are typically not equipped to deal with the real dangers that exist in the kitchen, their palates are undeveloped, and their ability to communicate nuanced ideas is limited. The chance that a child is going to come up with food to rival Cook's Illustrated or Ina Garten is about as likely as a 17-year-old perfecting the next great malbec-syrah blend.
Offline
#23 2009-03-12 02:04:34
There’s no way I would eat at a restaurant that featured a child in the kitchen putting its dirty tongue and filthy hands on everything.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#24 2009-03-12 02:09:27
fnord wrote:
There’s no way I would eat at a restaurant that featured a child in the kitchen putting its dirty tongue and filthy hands on everything.
...hell, I have enough trouble eating at places that let allow the CUSTOMERS to bring children.
Offline
#25 2009-03-12 05:36:35
ptah13 wrote:
Whatever happened to "children should be seen and not heard"?
I have a friend who has an adorable 5-y-o that talks constantly. My friend and his wife expect everyone around to stop everything while the boy talks, which he does non-stop. He can be in another room talking up some other adults and you and someone are having a conversation and are in mid-sentence and the boy comes in to tell you about his favorite thing of the day, and my friend or his wife will get PISSED at you if you don't stop what you are saying and allow the boy to manipulate all conversation from that point forward.
Needless to say, my friend and his wife (and their now 2 children) spend most of their time together, as a family, and company doesn't come round anymore....
The sad thing is, I've seen this sort of thing in several "only child" families going back to the 90's.
Back in my grandmothers day, all the kids quit talking the moment their dad walked through the door and didn't say another word until he left for work the next morning. Funny thing is, they all turned out great, had great families and seemed happy as hell, even though if they stepped out of line, when they were kids, they had to go cut their own switch.....
Oh yeah, I forgot, kids and teens are so much more well behaved and well mannered now than they were before Dr Phil and Oprah....
Jr Republican and Jr Fashionista are simply products of the "It Takes a Village" age.
Offline
#26 2009-03-12 06:43:39
Little prick. Fortunately, most irritating child "savants" hit a wall and crash and burn when they get to college and find that suddenly they're no more clever or celebrated than the other kids...although this kid is more of an IDIOT savant. Or just an idiot. Wedgie target for sure. Where's a bully when you need one?
Last edited by scarydog (2009-03-12 06:50:36)
Offline
#27 2009-03-12 15:40:07
Oh please tell me the conservatives have come up with somethging more then this since the election. I know I have been out of the loop lately. So far out that I have not looked at the news or read a paper since Christmass. but for weeping jesus's sake, are they hanging it all on children like this?
I think I might go put my head back in the sand.
Offline
#28 2009-03-12 15:43:47
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
but for weeping jesus's sake, are they hanging it all on children like this?
No, you've still got Mitt, Sarah, and Bobby. Little kids and religious nuts, that's the GOP at the moment.
I'm loving it, personally.
Offline
#29 2009-03-12 19:41:02
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
but for weeping jesus's sake, are they hanging it all on children like this?
No, you've still got Mitt, Sarah, and Bobby. Little kids and religious nuts, that's the GOP at the moment.
I'm loving it, personally.
All while the left is already covering up the crimes of the new administrations' appointees:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090312/pl_ … dra_raid_5
Of course, Kundra had no idea he was paying "ghost employees".... lol
Let the scandals begin!!!!
Offline
#30 2009-03-12 19:52:16
ptah13 wrote:
Let the scandals begin!!!!
Careful what you wish for, ptah. The new administration could always decide to start doing serious investigating of the last administration, and their scandals were bigger. I'm sure there's a great big file of contingency dirt sitting in Obama's desk just waiting to be used.
Offline
#31 2009-03-12 20:01:10
jesusluvspegging wrote:
ptah13 wrote:
Let the scandals begin!!!!
Careful what you wish for, ptah. The new administration could always decide to start doing serious investigating of the last administration, and their scandals were bigger. I'm sure there's a great big file of contingency dirt sitting in Obama's desk just waiting to be used.
Meet the new Boss. Same as the old Boss.
Offline
#32 2009-03-12 20:06:44
ptah13 wrote:
All while the left is already covering up the crimes of the new administrations' appointees:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090312/pl_ … dra_raid_5
Of course, Kundra had no idea he was paying "ghost employees".... lol
Let the scandals begin!!!!
Where is the cover up in this story? Did you even read it?
On second thought, I enjoy a good dose of innuendo and aspersion every now again myself, so have fun with it.
Offline
#33 2009-03-12 20:09:32
Offline
#34 2009-03-13 01:24:52
Another picture of the little fashion fag. I realize his orientation can't be changed, but shouldn't his parents at least try to get him to butch up his act?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by fnord (2009-03-13 01:25:15)
Offline
#35 2009-03-13 05:00:37
Virgin Sweater Vest Sporting Republican Half Jews in 2020!
Offline
#36 2009-03-13 06:25:02
Fled wrote:
ptah13 wrote:
All while the left is already covering up the crimes of the new administrations' appointees:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090312/pl_ … dra_raid_5
Of course, Kundra had no idea he was paying "ghost employees".... lol
Let the scandals begin!!!!Where is the cover up in this story? Did you even read it?
On second thought, I enjoy a good dose of innuendo and aspersion every now again myself, so have fun with it.
Hmmm... Well, let's see. If two of your direct reports were paying "ghost employees", you think you would have no idea it was going on? (not to mention the mountain of other b.s. these people were into)
Offline
#37 2009-03-13 06:26:06
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
jesusluvspegging wrote:
ptah13 wrote:
Let the scandals begin!!!!
Careful what you wish for, ptah. The new administration could always decide to start doing serious investigating of the last administration, and their scandals were bigger. I'm sure there's a great big file of contingency dirt sitting in Obama's desk just waiting to be used.
Meet the new Boss. Same as the old Boss.
amen to that...
Offline
#38 2009-03-13 06:38:27
Offline
#39 2009-03-13 10:55:31
fnord wrote:
Another picture of the little fashion fag. I realize his orientation can't be changed, but shouldn't his parents at least try to get him to butch up his act?
No, what's sad is that he will probably be swimming in pussy by the time he gets a little fuzz on his pecker. The hens always flock to the brightest peacock.
Offline
#41 2009-03-13 21:22:37
To clarify something: I wasn't picking on this kid just because his mind was warped by home-schoolin' religious right-wing Fox-News-is-the-only-news-we-watch-in-this-house parents; I would've picked on this kid even if he had come home everyday from a public school parroting green/socialist nonsense from left-wing union-protected teachers as well.
Offline
#42 2009-03-13 21:23:50
He's probably going to have his own show.
Offline
#43 2009-03-26 13:36:15
AladdinSane wrote:
To clarify something: I wasn't picking on this kid just because his mind was warped by home-schoolin' religious right-wing Fox-News-is-the-only-news-we-watch-in-this-house parents; I would've picked on this kid even if he had come home everyday from a public school parroting green/socialist nonsense from left-wing union-protected teachers as well.
Offline
#45 2009-04-23 19:50:46
GooberMcNutly wrote:
More of the little snotty shits are taking over!
Thank goodness the twerp is in Grand Cayman. They must be fresh out of adult snake oil salesmen there.
Offline
#46 2009-05-10 23:30:52
AladdinSane wrote:
AladdinSane wrote:
To clarify something: I wasn't picking on this kid just because his mind was warped by home-schoolin' religious right-wing Fox-News-is-the-only-news-we-watch-in-this-house parents; I would've picked on this kid even if he had come home everyday from a public school parroting green/socialist nonsense from left-wing union-protected teachers as well.
...And many children who watch it take it to heart: riding in the car one day with his parents in Tacoma, Wash., Rafael de la Torre Batker, 9, was worried about whether it would be bad for the planet if he got a new set of Legos.
[...]
Sometimes teachers observe the opposite: children who become environmental advocates at home after seeing the video. After Jasmine Madavi, 18, saw it last year in Mr. Lukach’s class at Woodside Priory, she began nagging her parents to stop buying bottled water. Her mother resisted, saying that filtered tap water, Jasmine’s suggested alternative, would not taste as good. But Jasmine bought the filter on her own, and the household is now converted.
Offline
#47 2009-05-11 00:12:30
sic wrote:
Ah, just wait until this boy's perversions come to light. I'm sure we will be all shocked - SHOCKED I say, that he likes little boys (in sweater-vests).
You give him too much credit -- Dude's gonna be into pug dogs in sweater vests.
Offline
#48 2009-05-11 01:16:19
exdwarf wrote:
sic wrote:
Ah, just wait until this boy's perversions come to light. I'm sure we will be all shocked - SHOCKED I say, that he likes little boys (in sweater-vests).
You give him too much credit -- Dude's gonna be into pug dogs in sweater vests.
Nah. They'll just him catch dry-humping plain old sweater vests, with nothing in them.
Offline