Hi George!

Isn’t that speeeeciaal!

Emmeran wrote:

sofaking wrote:

Hmmm.

She's been a attention whore her entire life, what difference does that make?  She is entitled to her opinions on this issue and her personal reasons for having those opinions..

There's a difference between voicing one's opinion when asked a direct question and joining the Bigot Coalition for Fucktardery or whatever it's called that she joined right after she became a moral authority regarding people's intimate relationships by answering the question as she did. She's all of 21, and doesn't yet comprehend that the quest for certainty blocks the search for meaning. Uncertainty is the very condition to impel man to unfold his powers. Once a person has decided any subjective belief they might hold is THE ANSWER, they turn into stupid rabid fools who want to shove their idea of morality down everyone's throat.


I enjoy the mental gymnastics involved in rationalizing hypocrisy, don't get me wrong, but if I were advising her I'd say, "Wrapping yourself in religion NEVER ENDS WELL for the beauty queen.". Just say, "I'm no expert, and I am still learning about the mysteries of creation and trying to be a good person and trying help others. Big moral questions are for people with more experience and wisdom than I have at this point in my life".

And let it go. But...nope...she's parroting her parenting. I want to laugh in her dad's face.

And for the record, I did stuff when I was her age that would make those pictures look positively innocent, and I was also the product of a fairly strict Catholic upbringing. But I knew I was fucking retarded and evil to boot. I never tried to convince anyone anything...because I'm definitely immoral, but not a hypocrite.

Last edited by sofaking (2009-05-05 18:59:24)

It's her constitutional right to voice her opinion like an idiot.  That question was really uncalled for; particularly when directed at a solitary beauty priss.  The point of that question was to get the questioner and his web site publicity.

And could it possibly be that the 7 million that voted for Prop 8 had other reasons than what the nanny state nitwits claim?  Maybe like calling bullshit on the endless procession of "you have to do things my way" ballot initiatives?

Or maybe we really don't think that this silly term is worth giving the right-wing religious fundies reason to start strapping on the suicide vests and protecting 'gods way'?

Christ on a crutch people - think things through.

sofaking wrote:

It is her right, but those "morals" she's talking about are about as real as her tits.

She claims not to be perfect, but she is sure enough of herself to tell OTHERS how to live. The only time that's warranted is when you've made another person and it's your responsibility.

When I taught my son my brand of morality, I taught him that if something makes him (or anyone else) feel bad, it's probably wrong. So by MY brand of morality, she's being immoral by making millions of gay people feel like crap with her bigotry.

Now why is it that her opinion is "telling others how to live" and your opinion isn't?  Her opinion means as much as that of any other legal CA citizen; it means exactly one vote in our democratic society on the subject of the definition of a particular word.  The subject at hand has absolutely nothing to do with rights, priviledges or benefits; this only about the definition (or redefinition of a term).  It is morally rehensible of the left to claim that an fairly common individuals opinion is a form of repression. 

(And frankly if you don't like how marriage is defined in Cali you have the absolute right to vote with your feet - I thought Iowa was a very nice place to live if you don't mind the cold.)

I am somewhat irked that you have me defending this nit-wit; and you do realize that there is an outside chance that those are her real breasts.

Taint wrote:

She's a fucking beauty queen. Her sole purpose in life is to look pretty, not to think or offer any rational explanation for the occasional coherent thought she might actually have. Perez Hilton is a self-righteous douchebag who is only marginally more intelligent because he can, apparently, read and write. Neither of them deserve the time or effort that has been put into this "controversy".

I'm with you on this Taint, with the exception of one slight detail.  The douchebag asked her for her opinion and when she gave it, he and just about every liberal mouthpiece in the country jumped in her shit.  It's her opinion.  There's not supposed to be right and wrong answers to opinions in our country, expecially if you ask for them.

And as for taking her Miss California crown for so called "topless" photos, it's all part of the political witch hunt.  Here is the offending pic.  You decide.

Last edited by phreddy (2009-05-06 14:19:19)

The boobies thing is simple validation of how ridiculous these contests are.

sofaking wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

sofaking wrote:

It is her right, but those "morals" she's talking about are about as real as her tits.

She claims not to be perfect, but she is sure enough of herself to tell OTHERS how to live. The only time that's warranted is when you've made another person and it's your responsibility.

When I taught my son my brand of morality, I taught him that if something makes him (or anyone else) feel bad, it's probably wrong. So by MY brand of morality, she's being immoral by making millions of gay people feel like crap with her bigotry.

Now why is it that her opinion is "telling others how to live" and your opinion isn't?  Her opinion means as much as that of any other legal CA citizen; it means exactly one vote in our democratic society on the subject of the definition of a particular word.  The subject at hand has absolutely nothing to do with rights, priviledges or benefits; this only about the definition (or redefinition of a term).  It is morally rehensible of the left to claim that an fairly common individuals opinion is a form of repression. 

(And frankly if you don't like how marriage is defined in Cali you have the absolute right to vote with your feet - I thought Iowa was a very nice place to live if you don't mind the cold.)

I am somewhat irked that you have me defending this nit-wit; and you do realize that there is an outside chance that those are her real breasts.

I think there's an outside chance that you were too busy looking at the picture of the titties in question to read to the last paragraph of the article, which states:

Although Prejean said the pictures were taken when she was 17, others have alleged that they seem to have been taken after she underwent breast-enhancement surgery six weeks prior to the Miss USA pageant. That surgery was paid for by the Miss California pageant.

It was okay for her to answer the pageant question however she liked. It's that she joined the group AFTER the pageant. It's not like this has always been a cause she believed in enough to support it before she realized she could get that much more attention from everyone.

Now on to marriage. If you were to type in search all the things I have ever said here about what my humble opinion is on marriage itself as an institution, you would see that I am an ANTI-MARRIAGE zealot. I think it's the most retarded thing in the world. I have lived happily in sin for 16 years without it. I think it's the most unfair business contract ever devised, and instead of creating happiness, it FUCKS IT ALL UP. I think gay people are gonna hafta change the label "Gay" to something much more somber now that some states are legalizing their marriages.

However...

When I am invited to attend or participate in a wedding for one of my friends or family, I pick a nice expensive gift from their registry, and refrain from mentioning my own views on the incarceration nuptials. No one would ever know it's one of my most strongly held beliefs.

You know why? Because it's not my place to fuck things up for other people and their happiness. Miss California, as a gracious and congenial pageant contestant should also understand this. I think when they strip her of her second-place like they plan to, she might get a taste of someone peeing in HER Kool-Aid. Oh well, at least the pageant paid for her new boobies (I was kinda surprised they do that for contestants. I thought they had to supply their own boobies.)

Chill out Sofie



Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

sofaking wrote:

Will do.
https://cruelery.com/uploads/thumbs/3_bongbarbie.jpg

That went right to Melons in the Barbie department over at Mattel.

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Did you make that!?

You do not have blond hair, fnord.

The color of your eyes would be  ...  ?

No shit, you call this blond?



Fucking A hero.

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

fnord wrote:

...  I have blond hair.

What ever turns your crank, dumb fuck.

crank
kræŋk
noun
1.     Machinery. any of several types of arms or levers for imparting rotary or oscillatory motion to a rotating shaft, one end of the crank being fixed to the shaft and the other end receiving reciprocating motion from a hand, connecting rod, etc.

Yep

Last edited by MSG Tripps (2009-05-06 20:12:33)

jesusluvspegging wrote:

emphasis mine

No shit?

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Emphasis mine.

Say again.

No shit?

Get a room you two

MSG Tripps wrote:

Say again.

Authenticate B23 C78

Or just fuck off.

Negative, pigfucker, the pattern is full.

MSG Tripps wrote:

Sure thing pardner, what's next   ...  arm wresting?

Back to fnord?

Sure. 

If we go with your definition of crank, and we assume that fnord is the handle, what would the rotating shaft be?

Taint wrote:

She's a fucking beauty queen. Her sole purpose in life is to look pretty, not to think or offer any rational explanation for the occasional coherent thought she might actually have. Perez Hilton is a self-righteous douchebag who is only marginally more intelligent because he can, apparently, read and write. Neither of them deserve the time or effort that has been put into this "controversy".

Couldn't have said it better.

I also think the question was out of line.  Why not ask her about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict while they're at it...or whether creationation should be taught in public schools.  Since when were beauty queens expected to field controversial issues?  It was really a no win question.   No matter what her answer a large part of the population would have been offended.

I'm glad that we abandoned the term "cakefart."

headkicker_girl wrote:

Taint wrote:

She's a fucking beauty queen. Her sole purpose in life is to look pretty, not to think or offer any rational explanation for the occasional coherent thought she might actually have. Perez Hilton is a self-righteous douchebag who is only marginally more intelligent because he can, apparently, read and write. Neither of them deserve the time or effort that has been put into this "controversy".

Couldn't have said it better.

I also think the question was out of line.  Why not ask her about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict while they're at it...or whether creationation should be taught in public schools.  Since when were beauty queens expected to field controversial issues?  It was really a no win question.   No matter what her answer a large part of the population would have been offended.

Thank You to both of youse

A better question for that one would be: Spit or Swallow?  Double or triple?

Lust will find a way

fnord wrote:

Overstuffed closets are next to impossible to keep securely closed!

yummy three course meal.

fnord wrote:

Overstuffed closets are next to impossible to keep securely closed!

This must be what she meant by 'opposite marriage.'