Wasn't our place to decide for them. 


Are you now the official missing link?

Your narrow mindedness is showing Phreddy.  All cultures are equivalent, and we have no business condemning people with different customs from our own.  Having sex with a recently deceased woman could prove to be a delightful and culturally enriching experience for a non-Egyptian, non-Muslim man such as yourself.

Cunt Licker wrote:

Dumb, regressive, weird-ass laws that oppress women and guarantee the perpetuation of ignorance and poverty? It sounds to me like the southern states have replicated themselves in the Middle East - score another one for the USA. You are inconsistent Phreddy. Make up your mind.

I have made up my mind.  Those dumb, regressive, weird-ass laws to which your refer were all enacted by Democrats.  Not my political party.

So, I can now fuck my 14 year-old, dead wife? I guess I would want to know what she died from first but, sounds good.

Is this that much weirder than that last kiss good bye after a loved one has passed?  It's a very thin line and could be construed as a last act of love and tenderness.  And what if she wished it Phreddy; what if she saw it as a final parting gift to her beloved?  I don't understand it all of these religious people are freaks to me; from the Baptists to the Catholics to the Muslims and so on.

Romney baptizes dead people, Catholic's fuck children; honestly Phredd - banging your recently passed wife seems a little pale by comparison. 

Besides, then you get a chance to do the things that she had always categorized as happening as: "Over my dead body"!!

(I, myself, can't see how someone could manage an erection in that situation but I've not experienced that situation so what do I know?)

Em wrote:

Besides, then you get a chance to do the things that she had always categorized as happening as: "Over my dead body"!!

Can't argue with that one.  One small issue which wasn't discussed in the article was that the cause of death among Muslim women is often at the hands of their husbands.  We've heard men say, "I don't know whether to fuck her or beat her to death!".  Well, in this case they do both, but not in the same order as prescribed in American tradition.

phreddy wrote:

Cunt Licker wrote:

Nonsense, Phreddy. If you were brown you'd be Taliban.

You apparently have not been paying much attention to my posts over the years.  Here is a refresher on Phreddy's societal and political persuasions:

Atheist - Check
Pro abortion - Check (but you pay for it)
Legalize all drugs - Check
Pro 2nd Amendment (and all other guaranteed rights) - Check
Against government meddling and surveillance - Check
Pro free market - Check
Strong on national defense - Check
Pro homosexual unions/marriage - Check
Tough on crime - Check
Limited government - Check
Provide safety net for poor and disabled - Check
Personal responsibility - Double Check

Based on that list, and your perverse self-identification as a Repubican, I stand by my statement. If you were brown you'd be all of the above...and somehow still a Taliban. Are you living in the past, Phreddy, when Repubicans were something more than crazy inbred christians doing their level best to institutionalize violence and ignorance as the keystones of American culture?

phreddy wrote:

WCL wrote:

doing their level best to institutionalize violence and ignorance as the keystones of American culture?

Are you kidding?  This is the mantra of the modern American liberal.  Without institutionalized ignorance sanctimonious intellectuals like you would have no proselytes.

See Phreddy, this is where you go off base - somehow you seriously want government to be involved with how families interact but you don't want them to regulate public sectors.  It's called a Theocracy, big intervention in personal liberties but zero over-sight of the area's renowned for high corruption.

Every time you spout the conservative talking points I'm reminded of the Bush era SEC:  See no evil in corporate transactions and hammer unimportant peons (ref: Madoff, Bear Stearns, Goldman, etc.)

Let me remind you:
  1.  Capitalism because it has a competitive core requires strong regulation and over-sight or it always degrades into corruption and chaos.
  2.  Socialism because it has a cooperative core requires less government and oversight but can degrade into entitlementalism if allowed to remove individual risk.
  3.  Communism/Fascism/Theocracies have both excessive regulation and excessive government along with an extreme amount of corruption.

You've got the recipe all twisted up in your head, so please focus on keeping Government out of my bedroom and instead keeping a watchful eye on the greedy people.

Besides, what do you care if I bang Melons after she has passed - it's really none of your fucking business.

Phwedd Said:

Atheist - Check
Pro abortion - Check (but you pay for it)
Legalize all drugs - Check
Pro 2nd Amendment (and all other guaranteed rights) - Check
Against government meddling and surveillance - Check
Pro free market - Check
Strong on national defense - Check
Pro homosexual unions/marriage - Check
Tough on crime - Check
Limited government - Check
Provide safety net for poor and disabled - Check
Personal responsibility - Double Check

Outside of wanting to suck Coulter's Cock you really are a warm and fuzzy guy, more like a centrist demo(c)rat from the 1980's than anything else.

Quit pretending, and come out of that self-imposed faux right wing closet.  You'll feel better for it!

And if you're Moroccan (http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16189226), you can rape a 16 year old, force her to marry you because of it.

But does that backwater then allow you to fuck her corpse? Probably not, they're stuck in the 20th century.

oops, sorry Em, no rogering Melons lifeless corpse for you.

It was all just made up hooey.